Join a local coalition or start one!

Find a Group

Sign Up

SUBSCRIBE to our newsletter and news digest
Go to Newsletter archive

No More Guantanamos

May 2010 Newsletter

In this issue:

Get involved! Contact us about starting a local coalition or asking your coalition to be part of our nationwide network. You may also join here.
Please share this newsletter with a friend!

First Obama Military Commission Tries Child Soldier. Report on the pre-trial hearing

The pre-trial hearing for the first Military Tribunal in Obama’s presidency began last week, following the delayed release of the new manual for Military Commissions.  The government’s justification for trying Omar Khadr by Military Commission is that, in its view, his alleged murder of a US soldier via a hand grenade was a violation of the law of war. According to Lt. Col. David Frakt, under the Military Commission rules, “A detainee may be convicted of murder in violation of the law of war even if they did not actually violate the law of war.”
The hearing is moving forward despite weak evidence that Khadr actually threw the grenade that killed an Army sergeant, signs that he was mistreated while in US custody, and his youth at the time of the alleged crime. Khadr was only 15 years old. Now 23, he has spent more than one-third of his life in US custody.
The big question is, why force a conviction by using a legal concoction that is inherently unfair, in which the prosecution and the presiding judge and jury are drawn from the same government agency, and in which the defendants—unlike their counterparts in a military court martial or a civilian trial—are not entitled to the same access to evidence that the government has.
The prosecution has called several witnesses to support its case. However, the government’s eyewitness to the alleged crime initially reported that the perpetrator died after throwing the grenade, then changed the record years later. The defense is expected to show a photo taken at the time the grenade was thrown, of a pile of rubble under which US soldiers later found Khadr’s bullet-ridden body face down.
Other prosecution witnesses, such as former interrogators, supported the government’s position that Khadr’s interrogations were friendly and his treatment humane, and that, therefore, Khadr’s admissions that he threw the grenade are credible. However, nearly all the witnesses have inadvertently provided pieces of testimony that support Khadr’s defense attorneys’ claim that all evidence against their client is tainted and should be discarded.
For example, Khadr’s interrogators at Guantanamo informed him that if he cooperated by telling his interrogators whatever they wanted to hear, he would go home to Canada more quickly. Descriptions of their friendly gestures—to a boy who otherwise was alone and lonely in his cell—such as friendly conversations and treats they brought him, can also be viewed as bribes to Khadr for telling them what they wanted to hear. And although none has admitted that Khadr was tortured, the medic at Bagram prison who changed the dressings on Khadr’s wounds twice daily admitted that one day he found Khadr hooded and hung by chaines to the outside of his cell door with his wrists above eye level. He lifted Khadr’s hood and found he was crying, yet the medic did not support a defense attorney’s suggestion that Khadr’s hanging in that way would have been painful, given recent surgeries to repair the bullet wound in his shoulder.
Col. Patrick Parrish, the presiding military judge, has refused the defense counsels’ request that they be allowed to question all of Khadr’s interrogators. However, Parrish did permit testimony of at least two of the witnesses the defense team selected. Joshua Claus, the Army specialist who conducted virtually all of Khadr’s interrogations at Bagram, testified on Wednesday. Claus was responsible for the violent homicides at Bagram of two detainees: Habibullah and Dilawar. Former Army Specialist Damien Corsetti, who conducted Khadr’s first interrogation at Bagram, also testified this week. In Corsetti’s opinion, Khadr was abused at Bagram in 2002, and he admitted that he participated in the abuse. For example, Corsetti used a false story about a gang rape and death of another detainee in order to frighten Khadr into cooperating with him.  Read about it here.
On May 6, the Pentagon barred Carol Rosenberg of the Miami Herald and three Canadian journalists covering the tribunal for naming Claus, even though Claus’s name has appeared in news reports since 2005, when he was convicted of abusing Bagram detainees.  Read the story here.
Khadr’s Military Commission is scheduled to begin in July. However, senior Obama administration officials and both the prosecution and defense teams are interested in a plea deal.

Grassroots News

Rendition Accountability is Goal of North Carolina Conference

NMG ally North Carolina Stop Torture Now (NCSTN)  teamed up with Duke University’s Human Rights Center, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill School of Law, and others to host a three-day conference in April.
The goal of the conference, called “Weaving a Net of Accountability,” is to take on extraordinary rendition at the state and regional level. The conference organizers brought together some two-dozen speakers including writer Scott Horton, rendition survivor and former Guantánamo detainee Bisher al-Rawi (via video conference), legal experts, grassroots and human rights activists, and students.
According to the conference organizers, the conference is a step toward their goal of establishing a commission of inquiry to investigate local involvement in rendition. According to Christina Cowger, an NCSTN coordinator, “For more than four years, we’ve been telling state and county officials they needed to look into Aero Contractors’ role in major human rights abuses, but they’ve refused. Elsewhere in the world, there are official inquiries into the support given to the US in transporting captives for torture. Here, apparently it will have to start with a citizens’ inquiry, and we hope that will eventually persuade our government to do the right thing and investigate.”

Leverett (MA) Town Meeting Passes Second US Resolution Welcoming Cleared Detainees

On Saturday, April 24, Leverett (MA) Town Meeting became the second US municipal body to welcome cleared Guantánamo detainees to their town. The resolution it passed, welcoming a few cleared detainees once Congress lifts its current ban, is identical to the resolution that the nearby town of Amherst, MA, passed on November 4, 2009.
According to Leverett residents who spoke in favor of the resolution, stories of detainees that speakers shared at a public forum shortly before the vote cemented their support for the resolution.
NMG congratulates Beth Adams, the Leverett resident who petitioned to place the resolution on the Town Meeting warrant, the committee of supporters in Leverett who leafleted and supported an educational forum, and Pioneer Valley No More Guantánamos, which also lent its support.

What You Can Do


NMG seeks other local groups to tell the stories of detainees. We have several detainees at Guantánamo Bay and Bagram with compelling stories that need to be told to the American people. Please contact us or forward this newsletter to a friend.


No More Guantánamos
P.O. Box 618
Whately, MA 01093
Telephone: 413-665-1150